*giggles*
Oh, how mistaken you are, saying that I have not read enough Latin.
You see, this speech you mention. I've read it. I've
translated it. In fact, I was even
examined on it - I studied it as a set text. Needless to say, I almost got full marks. I'm aware of Cicero's rhetorical power.
Also, I'd just like to say that that was not his most famous speech - that honour belongs to his disassembling of the Catiline conspiracy. Cicero was the first consul to not have come from a noble background. He was one of histories greatest men. However, that does not make the language great (on a side note, I do acknowledge Latin's greatness. However, Greek is simply better.)
But I think you misunderstand variatio. Let me give you some examples.
Indirect statements: In Latin, there is one way of saying them. In Greek, four.
'When' clauses: In Latin, it depends on the situation, however in any given situation there is only one that you should use and was used. In Greek: three, all of them viable at any time.
Result Clauses: In Latin, one. In Greek, three.
Articles: In Latin... oh wait was that
none? Although Latin survived pretty well without them, they are only a boon to Greek.
This is what variatio is. Latin authors had to make do with synonyms, Greek ones with great variance of structure.
Count Darvaleth said:
The Romans took many ideas from the Greeks, yes. But did the Greeks take Roman ideas? Not really. The Romans defeated the Greeks, not the other way around. It was the Roman Empire that expanded to take up so much of the world, not the Greek Empire. Surely the Roman willingness to adapt shows that they were superior? And that's without mentioning the many things that they came up with themselves.
If the Greeks had been truly greater, they would not have become a small colony. But that's beside the point from a language perspective!
This is not a question of Language, but of society. The greeks, as a whole (with some notable exceptions) were unwarlike, and more importantly, ununified, fighting most of their battles with each other. Greece was not, for the most part, a single nation. There was a sort of enveloping definition, but for the most part seperate. The best allegory I can conjure is that it is like the States of America without the American Government.
Regardless, your point is utterly meaningless. The Romans were a relatively war-like people. The Greeks, for the most part, were not. This has nothing to do with language.