Ok then, before we start we need to know our plan of attack. Going at it from all angles is a good way for a User Project to fail.
Firstly, I think using the following format from the other User Projects works well:
This has worked well previously, so as it tried and tested makes sense to use it again.
However what does need to be decided on is what should be discussed per thread. Should movement be a thread, or should it be broke down further, such as a thread for marching etc?
What order? Should be just do it as per the current BRB and see where we end up at the end?
My thoughts are:
Main areas should have a thread, so charging has a thread which includes declaring, reactions, movement etc. Next thread is compulsory movement. Next thread is normal movement and so forth.
I think to make it nice and simple, we should discuss it in the order of the 8th edition rulebook.
Firstly, I think using the following format from the other User Projects works well:
- Thread is created to discuss a section.
- First post in the thread is updated as per discussion, with the majority of opinions being use to amend / create rules
- New rules etc go to vote.
- If voting is successful it gets added to the new rulebook
- If unsuccessful, the discussion thread is reopened to discuss further.
This has worked well previously, so as it tried and tested makes sense to use it again.
However what does need to be decided on is what should be discussed per thread. Should movement be a thread, or should it be broke down further, such as a thread for marching etc?
What order? Should be just do it as per the current BRB and see where we end up at the end?
My thoughts are:
Main areas should have a thread, so charging has a thread which includes declaring, reactions, movement etc. Next thread is compulsory movement. Next thread is normal movement and so forth.
I think to make it nice and simple, we should discuss it in the order of the 8th edition rulebook.