New 8th rule rumours....We're nerfed!!!

  • The masquerade of murder returns! A new game of Vampires Amongst Us has begun. Unmask the killers, trust no one, and try to survive the night. Find out more and sign up now!

midean

Vampire Count
True Blood
Mar 12, 2008
1,098
Zombies
362
25% Character choice? So anybody thought about the new 8th edition rumurs that looks like it's true. So if effect in a 2K army you can have 500 pts in characters. 1 Lord and maybe a necro. Thats it. Gonna really nerf us big time....Still reading the rest. This is the one that really stuck out to me....

http://warhammer.org.uk/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=71159
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Apparently it is based around bigger battles 3k rather than 2k which should help somewhat. at least thats the only one i believe so far - bigger armies - more £££
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Ok this is discussed in multiple multiple places already :P and dont get your panties in a bunch just yet

I hear the percentages are as follows (and most rumours say this too)

25 percent MINIMUM core
25 percent MAXIMUM rare
25 percent MAXIMUM special

No percentage for characters, what this means is you have to take 1/4 of your army as core, you can then..if you like take up to 75 percent points in characters it just means you can have less special and rare.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

As much fun as theorizing can be, keep in mind that we're unlikely to know the full extent of changes that 8th edition will bring. We might suffer in some areas while being strengthened in others. The sky isn't falling just yet. ;)
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Heavy cavalry no longer able to march
- Heavy cavalry, defined as any cavalry with a 2+ or better save, cannot march. They can double their move when charging as normal, but they are not allowed to make a March move.
- "Medium and Fast cavalry remain the same".

Now this sounds silly to me, I'm pretty sure Horses (which would be used for heavy cavalry) where bread to carry the load of Flully plated knights and barding without too much difficuilty (Hence the -1for barding now). This will worry the bret players out there
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Even of we get nerfed a bit, we'll still be one of the top armies. And they cant nerf our Badass-ness :thumbsup:
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Capt Rubber Ducky said:
Now this sounds silly to me, I'm pretty sure Horses (which would be used for heavy cavalry) where bread to carry the load of Flully plated knights and barding without too much difficuilty (Hence the -1for barding now). This will worry the bret players out there


Not true as a matter of fact - truly heavy cavalry only ran/moved fast just before the charge in order to stay in formation to get maximum impact. though lets face it they changed it to prevent second turn charges with cavalry deathstars (or first turn as vampires :devil2:)
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Im more interested in the overhaul magic is getting. Ive heard numerous rumors and I dont like any of them really. Also the "one save" thing is kind of a bust for us as well as it hurts us much, much more to lose our lord than other armies......
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

its interesting to think that with 2d6+5 power dice (as some rumours suggest) IoN spam will become even more powerful, even with only one caster.

can you imagine, a level 2 caster able to keep up the entire army while a combat lord runs amok?
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Captain of the Rubber Ducky said:
I'm pretty sure Horses (which would be used for heavy cavalry) where bread to carry the load of Flully plated knights and barding without too much difficuilty.

Horses were bread!? It makes you wonder why anyone you go through all the trouble of baking something that large, let alone taking the massive pastry into battle!
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

@ Vakarin : :rofl2:
I missed that line when I read it. Lolz. Maybe GW is feeding out rumors so everyone gets twitchy about the new rule book, therefore buys it to make sure their army is not going down the tubes, therefore boosting their sales?

*Forgive me if I'm completely wrong and off topic here. I don't play, just like the modelling/painting aspect so most of this doesn't really bother me...
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Rumour is that mid-July is the predicted release date for the new book... Though I've only heard it along the grape vine, so take it as you will...
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Assuming the 25% cap on characters rumour is true (which seems to be the general consensus), i don't really think that we'll suffer more from it than a lot of other armies:

Vampires: Huge hit on the characters, IoN spam with small core units will likely be impossible. Still, we have cheap combat characters in the Wight Kings and cheap magic options in the Necromancers. Minimum core requirement won't be too bad, since we'll have to up the size of our Ghouls/Skeletons to compensate for less raising, and some more Dire Wolves/Corpse Carts/Bat Swarms won't hurt anyway.

DoC: No longer able to take a tooled up Bloodthirster, even in a 3k battle it'll be hard to fit in a Greater Deamon and a BSB Herald, Minimum core requirement also means that they'll actually need to bring infantry apart from the 3x10 Horrors.

Lizardmen: Slann+Engine anyone? Not going to happen at 2.5k, maybe at 3k, but then there won't be any Scar-vet tanks to worry about. Not really hurt by minimum core requirements.

Dark Elves: No more Dragon Lord in 2k, but apart from that everything will stay unchanged. Will probably replace DoC as the strongest army around.

Skaven: Current power builds will get hit rather hard by the character restriction. Grey Seer + Priest on Furnace is a no-go, and they really NEED a BSB in the army as well. Maybe we'll see more Warlord lists.

Empire: No more double Steam Tank in 2k, huzzah! Arch Lector on War Altar might be too expensive, so we might see a resurgence of "proper" Empire Armies with General of the Empire, BSB and all the cool stuff that noone takes now.

The armies that don't get hit too bad by this are mainly in the weaker spectrum today, and I won't be whining about the unfairness of O&G, Dwarfs and DoW not getting "nerfed".:lol:
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Gokamok said:
Assuming the 25% cap on characters rumour is true (which seems to be the general consensus), i don't really think that we'll suffer more from it than a lot of other armies:

Don't forget the other pretty solid rumors going around - in particular the removal of auto-break from fear and the switch to more objective-based scenarios, with standard-bearing core infantry units being the only units that can claim objectives.

Note that my comments are assuming all of these changes are accurate. Any or all of them could still turn out to be untrue.

Vampires:
Don't forget that with standards needed to claim objectives, ghouls will no longer be a viable mainstay unit, which means that between ditching most of their heroes and switching from ghouls to skellies, many VC players are going to find pretty much their entire armies scrapped by the new rules. Ouch!

Also, remember that Vamp core infantry, skeletons especially, tends to rely on hero support and fear autobreak to be effective. Restrictions oh heroes and loss of autobreak is going to hit vamps hard, and will hurt hardest in the units that become most essential in the new edition.

And players with Dragons will find their centerpieces becoming all but useless, though that hits everyone across the board. And while we have some somewhat affordable heroes, choosing them instead of vampires is going to have some painful effects on your army's maneuverability.

All in all, I do think vamps are going to take a big hit, especially power players (blood knight death stars and invocation spamming ghoul lists in particular are set to be gutted) and fluff players whose themes favor ghouls. I wouldn't want to be the one to explain to a strigoi player how he has to start fielding skeletons instead of ghouls if he wants to have even the possibility of winning most scenarios.

Unrestricted core wizards, where most armies can only get magic from their heavily limited hero allowance. Extremely points efficient hero options in the heralds, to get some serious impact out of what hero points are allowed. Units that are underpriced for what they do pretty much across the board. Daemons will take a hit, no doubt, but I really don't think it will be that hard of one. Maybe they'll be brought down to the level of dark elves, but maybe not.

Lizardmen:
Slann and Engines will be things of the past, but at least they've still got the powerful and points efficient saurus options. I don't think lizzies overall will be hurt too bad, but it will be a big adjustment for anyone who used to use a Slann as the center of their strategy, or the centerpiece of their army.

Wood Elves: You didn't mention them, but they're going to take a heavy blow from the switch to objective grabbing, and the problem that only standard bearing core troops can claim them. The Drycha army is just dead, and the need to take a rather inefficient lord choice to have anything other then archers with which to grab objectives is going to hurt.

Tomb Kings: They get hit just as bad as Vamp Counts, only they weren't very good to begin with. Good thing their book is on the short list, because they'll basically be a non-entity until it's released, along the level of ogre kingdoms.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

I might agree with and credit alot of these changes if Games Workshop 100% cannot invalidate their army books, and ALL of the current army books in print give tables and lists of character "numbers" as opposed to percentages. If they're changing this they need to reprint and replace all of the current books in print, whic GW won't do because so many people will complain that they've bought invalid army books and they want replacements... Lets face it, invalidating ANY major rules in ANY book will result in a big vicious circle for GW, from those who have recently bought books.

Think about it, in the WD issue the month they release the current book (which I have just dug out for this reason) they specifically said that they spent ages and ages checking EVERYTHING they wrote in the new book in order to ensure nothing they wrote invalidated any current items, and they reduced it to just two (one of which still worked, just suffered an unintended nerf): Beastmen's "raiders" forced them to rank up in 4's against those who had small frontage, which was fine before but now they couldn't gain rank bonus against small frontaged enemies. The other was a Bret (I think) item, which basically sacrificed a Wizards casting for one turn to generate extra PD's, although now, no one else could use them...

The point is, GW will do everything they can to avoid invalidating ANY rules. I mean, it makes sense to do this % limits thing, it'd make the game more tactical and less like War - "If I take really stupid units you can't kill them and I kill your entire armies while you watch me roll 5 million more dice than you" says the 2xSTank/Slann+Engineofthegods/GeneralDaemons, all in 2k points, player - hammer, BUT it'd also make endless black holes and vicious circles around all their current books in print, which GW won't do. They're unfortunately always a business over an entertainment organisation for us, and it all comes back down to the "how much can we sell you?" philosiphy... they're much more likely to ask that than "how can we help you?" nowadays...

Its really sad, and I know the rumours are pro-whatever I'm arguing about, but I honestly can't see it happening based on how GW are now... they'll lose alot... no, they'll make considerably less if they carry out this particular change.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Humaneater said:
I might agree with and credit alot of these changes if Games Workshop 100% cannot invalidate their army books, and ALL of the current army books in print give tables and lists of character "numbers" as opposed to percentages. If they're changing this they need to reprint and replace all of the current books in print, whic GW won't do because so many people will complain that they've bought invalid army books and they want replacements... Lets face it, invalidating ANY major rules in ANY book will result in a big vicious circle for GW, from those who have recently bought books.

Think about it, in the WD issue the month they release the current book (which I have just dug out for this reason) they specifically said that they spent ages and ages checking EVERYTHING they wrote in the new book in order to ensure nothing they wrote invalidated any current items, and they reduced it to just two (one of which still worked, just suffered an unintended nerf): Beastmen's "raiders" forced them to rank up in 4's against those who had small frontage, which was fine before but now they couldn't gain rank bonus against small frontaged enemies. The other was a Bret (I think) item, which basically sacrificed a Wizards casting for one turn to generate extra PD's, although now, no one else could use them...

The point is, GW will do everything they can to avoid invalidating ANY rules. I mean, it makes sense to do this % limits thing, it'd make the game more tactical and less like War - "If I take really stupid units you can't kill them and I kill your entire armies while you watch me roll 5 million more dice than you" says the 2xSTank/Slann+Engineofthegods/GeneralDaemons, all in 2k points, player - hammer, BUT it'd also make endless black holes and vicious circles around all their current books in print, which GW won't do. They're unfortunately always a business over an entertainment organisation for us, and it all comes back down to the "how much can we sell you?" philosiphy... they're much more likely to ask that than "how can we help you?" nowadays...

Its really sad, and I know the rumours are pro-whatever I'm arguing about, but I honestly can't see it happening based on how GW are now... they'll lose alot... no, they'll make considerably less if they carry out this particular change.


My first post! Yay.

Your argument has some good points - I'm sure GW doesn't like invalidating army books, or any other rules, that they don't have to. But it's certainly not unprecedented. The obvious example being the switch from 5th to 6th edition (which, coincidentally, is when I stopped playing WHFB), when every army book was made moot. They released a (free, if I remember right) supplement called Ravening Hordes that had every army book with scaled down rules to tide players over with until they started pumping out real army books.

Now, I find it ironic that they're undoing some of the biggest changes that 6th edition brought - the switch from percentages, the reduction in power of magic - and bringing them back now with 8th. It definitely seems more along the lines of major changes, like from 5th to 6th, rather then tweaks, like from 6th to 7th.

From what I understand, though, they won't be undoing any rules, because they're releasing a big FAQ a few weeks before the main release, in order to convert current army books to the new rule system.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

My mates and I have already agreed that if 8th ed. stipulates max 25% characters then we're gonna keep playing 7th ed. and just tell GW to bog off.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

It's worth noting that 8th may implement both percentages and number caps, keeping the number caps printed in the books fully up to date, while adding additional percentage restrictions in the main rulebook. This is actually looking relatively likely, due to, among other things, the ridiculousness that comes from the ability to spam some of the cheaper rare choices if percentages are the only restriction - ie, you brought how many pump wagons?!
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

I think the warseer rumours hold some snazzy glimmers of hope for us in VC land.

'Horde' - who does it better?

Consecutive unsuccessful casts resulting in a miscast makes Balefire cart duos more menacing.

IoN and Danse spam of unprecedented levels - allowing use of some of our more borderline bound items.

Our unbarded Black Knights still get to march. Chaos Knights don't.

No more 0+ armour + 3+ ward saves.

There are all kinds of positives - many more I haven't listed because I want to playtest once I have my sticky hands on a BRB.

Many will begrudge the fact that we have to re-tune our beloved armies, but we have to do that every time a new army book comes out anyway. There is some serious awesomeness in these rumours for us.
 
RE: New 8th rule rumurs....We're nerfed!!!

Malisteen said:
It's worth noting that 8th may implement both percentages and number caps, keeping the number caps printed in the books fully up to date, while adding additional percentage restrictions in the main rulebook. This is actually looking relatively likely, due to, among other things, the ridiculousness that comes from the ability to spam some of the cheaper rare choices if percentages are the only restriction - ie, you brought how many pump wagons?!

it will take both slots and percentage requirements to reign in the craziness, slots alone didn't do it and percentages only would be a whole new can of worms.



Fodderboy said:
I think the warseer rumours hold some snazzy glimmers of hope for us in VC land.

'Horde' - who does it better?

Consecutive unsuccessful casts resulting in a miscast makes Balefire cart duos more menacing.

IoN and Danse spam of unprecedented levels - allowing use of some of our more borderline bound items.

Our unbarded Black Knights still get to march. Chaos Knights don't.

No more 0+ armour + 3+ ward saves.

There are all kinds of positives - many more I haven't listed because I want to playtest once I have my sticky hands on a BRB.

Many will begrudge the fact that we have to re-tune our beloved armies, but we have to do that every time a new army book comes out anyway. There is some serious awesomeness in these rumours for us.

I totally agree it is not all doom and gloom for VC , Ghouls are going to rock in the horde formation 60 attacks or 61 with a Ghast and the "Step Up" where the second ranks gets to fill in for any losses in the front rank this will be a boon for our skeletons.

I am excited that the new focus will be on larger units and bigger games, Now I don't feel so bad about all my excessive model buying.
 

About us

  • Our community has been around for many years and pride ourselves on offering unbiased, critical discussion among people of all different backgrounds. We are working every day to make sure our community is one of the best.

Quick Navigation

User Menu