Red fury re rolls

[billybaker101]

This question came up the other day during a game my vamp lord was in combat cast van hels in the magic phase before combat. Now he made like 3 wounds and then another 3 attacks with red fury. Would these be re rolls due to van hels??? Some one at the game seemed to think so but i thought you cant get re rolls of re rolls can someone clear this up for me?

 

[TMS]

The extra attacks from Red Fury are not re-rolls, so there's nothing stopping them from being re-rolled. They are considered entirely new attacks, just that they won't generate further ones from red fury.

 

[billybaker101]

Really thats awesome ok well im glad i know cheers for the answer

 

[Willis_Zen]

Vanhel's states: "The target unit re-rolls failed To Hit rolls in close combat until the start of the caster's next Magic phase."

There aren't any stipulations on that.

It seems pretty clear cut to me. Those are To Hit rolls in Close Combat.
What was his thought on why you wouldn't be able to?

 

[billybaker101]

No actually it was me that thought you didnt get the re rolls. Ok one last thing then if i didnt get van hells and just had quick blood then would the red fury to hit rolls be re rollable?

 

[Demian]

Yes indeed!

Quickblood, Vanhel's, Hellish Vigour would all provide re-rolls for both initial attacks and red fury attacks.

 

[Skittelz1981]

it would be rerollbale if:

Your enemy doesnt have the ASF rule and your initiative is equal to or higher than his.


This is regarding the quickblood/ASF question.

I

 

[Mox]

The extra attacks from Red Fury are not re-rolls, so there's nothing stopping them from being re-rolled. They are considered entirely new attacks, just that they won't generate further ones from red fury.

And this is why we love Red Fury!