Count Vashra said:
Alakazard-Alcadizzar. You may now resume your interesting debate which I am enjoying reading. Keep going!
"Backs away slowly"
Cheers, moving house so don't have my books on me again till Sunday so was unable to check spelling.
Shareya said:
He was most certainly a improvement but even in Nehekhara and Strigois they did not slaughter people, they ruled fairly.
Its only when you think of their rotting insane cousins do vampires become truly evil.
We clearly have different views on what is fair

!
2)Ok, I think you have not read what I said at this point.
Sorry about that. I usually make my posts when at work and during my 18 hour shifts I turn into a zombie x)
Oh and seems you are going by the old lore? As the latest books don't have Vlad attacking Alakazard (damn his name...) at all.
Killing criminals only and not harming your own people seemed to be the fair point for me truth be told.
I do as well so I understand not getting to read everything at work, don't worry.
I go for the original source book lore, the new novels are a poor mans lore as are normally inconsistent with traits among characters, actions, filled with win buttons and general poetic licensing compared to the rule books, rp's, back ground books etc where its a history more than a work of ever changing fiction.
This tends to change allot as each author has their own take but each background update is based off the prior, not the same with novels.
Thus Nefrattas Husband being wrote out of the Novels all together when he was Nagash's chief general.
Christophe von Carstein said:
Isn't it one of the role playing books which essentially says that Vlad was Vashanesh (a name which is a nightmare to find out online when you cant spell it) one of the original vampires after drinking Neferata's elixir.
But since then im pretty sure GW have tried to distance themselves from that idea and have it so that Vashanesh is either dead or very good at hide and seek

because obviously GW have never tried to rewrite something and sweep it under the rug, SoC anyone haha
That book confirms that Vlad is Also Vashanesh but also Prince Vladimir (The one who taught Van Hal necromancy which was in order to defend against the Skaven invasion which again has been tweaked in the new Novel)
But yes, That is Nights Dark Masters.
GW rewrite Lore so much its sickening, they have so much old cannon style running side by side with the new cannon its more contradictory that the bible and makes even less sense.
Most however though default to the old lore as it was around 20+ years before this recent last 2 year bugger up with novels.
Its like GW saying tomorrow that in fact the Emperor killed Sanguinus and Horus was in fact the good guy, the size of the Bricks being shat and thrown straight at GW would be hard to even conceive, poor Mat Ward will likely get more than his fair hare of flack as well simply for being there at the time as well. lol
Count Vashra said:
Shareya said:
Oh and seems you are going by the old lore? As the latest books don't have Vlad attacking Alakazard (damn his name...) at all.
Yes, I was wondering wear this had come from too, because I have read all books in the Rise of Nagash trilogy and Vlad/Vashanesh is nowhere mentioned. All it says is that the Skaven give Alcadizzar a warpstone sword with the power to slay gods and then the Council protects him from Nagash's magic while he's chopping him up. In addition no Vampires are in that scene.
In the original they do, they just seemed to of removed this major character from the plot like.
Its like removing One of the More influential Primarchs from the Heresy, Fulgrim for example. total BS...
geordieclubba said:
in nights dark master warhammer roleplay book vlad is indeed Vashanesh.
He is spot on.
Also seems kinda weird how many Geordies are in this thread.
They don't tend to side with Mackems.
Christophe von Carstein said:
Well considering its suggested that Mannfred is not only aware but in part responsible for Vlads ring being stolen it wouldnt surprise me in the slightest that Vlad/Vashanesh is hiding in the shadows or turning a blind eye to Nagashs murder by Alakazard
And as far as im aware it was only theory that Vlad was vashanesh but ive just considered that it was largely true considering the lack of history for the Von Carsteins never mind just Vlad, but yeah even in the recent TK book they seem to have distanced themselves from Vashanesh at all
I personally would say 90% saying that he told them about it in the first place, the other 10% is Good side win button.
Shareya said:
geordieclubba said:
in nights dark master warhammer roleplay book vlad is indeed Vashanesh.
On what page is that so bluntly stated?
I would get it for you myself if I had my books to hand but if it has not already been quoted by Monday when I am in my new house I will get it for you.
Von Calyptra said:
Not to, er, re-rail this thread, but I think Sigmar's Blood is great! My only issue is that I'm struggling to understand Manfred's motivation. In a world of the undead, wouldn't vampires starve?
I noticed that the Knights of the Blazing Sun upgrade pack is no longer available on the GW website. Only GW would discontinue a model, and then release a product specifically requiring the use of that model.
We are getting a bit off topic here in fairness because its become more of a debate on morality of the Vampires themselves led by past events and characters.
Think I opened a can of worms on that one here:
https://www.vampirecounts.net/Thread-Vampires-are-not-Inherently-Evil-Just-Misunderstood?page=6
Just not got around to responding to it in a little while.
Not had much time and I know that requires allot of in depth arguments and reading. lol
Shareya said:
Von Calyptra said:
Not to, er, re-rail this thread, but I think Sigmar's Blood is great! My only issue is that I'm struggling to understand Manfred's motivation. In a world of the undead, wouldn't vampires starve?
I noticed that the Knights of the Blazing Sun upgrade pack is no longer available on the GW website. Only GW would discontinue a model, and then release a product specifically requiring the use of that model.
Manfred likely plans to keep some humans alive for food
BUT it is very possible that he is being influenced by Nagash already.
I just finished Master of Death and it had a curious pattern. Vampire(s) that where effected by Nagash usually turned bit more sinister and started to desire to create a undead world. So as mentioned before poor Manfred might be a puppet already and he simply does not know it.
It does make sense I think. If Nagash returns it would also make a lovely campaign and be a good way to push the lore forwards.
Living the dream mate.
Would love nothing more than some lore progression and maybe even unusual allies.
Think of the campaign where Vamps fought on both sides, even Skaven could be considered good in this.
Christophe von Carstein said:
I suppose it is plausible that Mannfred is being influenced by Nagash without realizing it, after all he has travelled to the land of the dead to learn from the likes of Nagash's acolytes/minions, who are looking to bring back Nagash and someone has powerful as Mannfred would be an ideal puppet because they would be unlikely to reveal all their secrets to him. Got to keep something in reserve
Plus it links in from the small amount of info ive gathered about his encounter with Be'lakor
As for the fact that Mannfred will need blood for food, he is going the wrong way about keeping people alive, by blocking out the sun killing off crops and animals and ultimetly humans, so he must have a plan somewhere. Although was it Abhorash that drank dragon blood and no longer needed human blood, maybe GW will come up with some crazy story as to how Mannfred no longer needs human blood, although it doesnt stop him from enjoying it (I dont think that's likely but just saying, it could happen)
In some GW lore Like Genevieve old vampires no longer have to drink.
That book also however had Vampire Giants as well so it was awash with strange happenings, like I said though, author poetic licencing.
