Legion of Nagash The Crone's Magical Distaste

[Zaak the Uncanny]

I was looking through the rules for the crone, spotted something odd and didn't know where to ask about it. So I'll do it here.

Her magical distaste - do they miscast on a double six? Surely this should still pass and still be irresistible force?

Or, if not, it should probably be explicitly explained to avoid confusion like mine.

 

[Disciple of Nagash]

Yes it would miscast still. I can make that clearer.

 

[Zaak the Uncanny]

Cool.

 

[Capt Rubber Ducky]

I was looking through the rules for the crone, spotted something odd and didn't know where to ask about it. So I'll do it here.

Her magical distaste - do they miscast on a double six? Surely this should still pass and still be irresistible force?

Or, if not, it should probably be explicitly explained to avoid confusion like mine.

Remember the rules say miscast takes presidance.

 

[Zaak the Uncanny]

Yeah, I was just wondering whether we should make it any double other than a six, so they get their irresistible. But if that's the way it was intended, then so be it.

 

[Bishop]

I think it should do both a Irrestiable and a Miscast... re: Book of Hoeth and Ring of Hotek.

 

[Disciple of Nagash]

The rules are already voted through for the time being, and the intention behind that rules was for a miscast on every double. Once it comes to playtesting things can be reviewed then.

 

[Bishop]

The rules are already voted through for the time being, and the intention behind that rules was for a miscast on every double. Once it comes to playtesting things can be reviewed then.

Given that there is already a precedent set regarding a casting roll that is both a miscast and an irresistable... it should follow those rules.

 

[Disciple of Nagash]

That precedent regarded two conflicting items. In that case the precedent would take place if the scream was being used in conjunction of the book of Hoeth. But in the case that someone just rolls a normal IF, then it is still a miscast as there is no conflict, the rule simply need clarifying.