yuckfoo said:So I'm guessing that our gg Death Star backed up by double ME couldn't beat this unit?
Blutsauger said:What about a Lord on a Zombie Dragon? With a mundane lance, Nightshroud, Quickblood and Red Fury he can put a lot of hurt on a unit like this. They'll be striking last at S3, and the Dragon can unleash his breath weapon and then LOT of attacks from the lord on top.
Front on he'll bounce, but on the flanks he'd be devastating. Plus, no cannons to worry about!
eggspr said:Watch the book come out and it's just 2+ vs magic in the magic phase... and we'll all laugh about the broken rumors
How could they let in an item giving an item with a 2+ vs all attacks against an entire army (DoC)? I honestly don't buy it.
eggspr said:Though for the folks that play uncomped sillyhammer... ouch, really ouch![]()
eggspr said:ETC banned common magic items like the folding fortress, so banning the banner wouldn't be out of the question.
Broken items like the pendant is restrcited, so they'll restrict the banner in a sense.
The best thing about ETC is it allows you to bring strong items/builds, for a price. There's no way they'll outright allow the banner if it's as what the rumors say it is. HE players will have to pony-up for it, big time. But that's ok... it dissallows utterly broken builds, so games are much motre reliant on a player's skill at playing the game as opposed to using broken combos.
We can't have a Vampire Lord with QB or RF if we bring 2 TGs. We can't ahve a TG if we bring a QB/RF Blendy Lord... Imagine what they restrict if you take this stupid bannwer?
Though for the folks that play uncomped sillyhammer... ouch, really ouch![]()
Lynks said:eggspr said:Though for the folks that play uncomped sillyhammer... ouch, really ouch![]()
IF it is as the rumours, then I'll probably just outright refuse to play against anyone taking it (at least if they slap it on their 60-70% of points deathstar). No loss on my part, there's always plenty of opponents where I game.
eggspr said:Lynks said:eggspr said:Though for the folks that play uncomped sillyhammer... ouch, really ouch![]()
IF it is as the rumours, then I'll probably just outright refuse to play against anyone taking it (at least if they slap it on their 60-70% of points deathstar). No loss on my part, there's always plenty of opponents where I game.
Much like people refusing to play against 3 red fury vamps in 18-20 BK deathstar consisting of 60% points flanked by 2 terrorgheists? I'm not saying u play that Lynks, but I've seen cheesy VC builds that creates the same "I'm not playing against that" reaction in uncomped settings.
eggspr said:Much like people refusing to play against 3 red fury vamps in 18-20 BK deathstar consisting of 60% points flanked by 2 terrorgheists? I'm not saying u play that Lynks, but I've seen cheesy VC builds that creates the same "I'm not playing against that" reaction in uncomped settings.
Darbagal said:I still think that something is missing. As was pointed out the rumored rules for this banner would completely mess up my daemons. 2+ ward against everything :O
The Sun King said:Here was hoping that the new HE was nerfed![]()
