Abbysal said:
Really Grish really? You truly believe that it is perfectly legal to be able to make someone skip their Evocation? You really believe there is a valid loop hole here?:zombie:
I really don't think that's how the rule was intended to be played. I do think Evocation was intended to suck up, at the very least, the WoM roll. From the current RAW, I do think it's possible to sequence out Evocation of Death. RAW in the past has created all kinds of stupid things; even nerfed entire armies, let alone a single unit.
Take for example Beastmen 6th edition to 7th edition. If you're not familiar with it, in 6th edition they had skirmishing units that formed into ranked units once they hit combat. However, the wording was they ranked up in ranks of 4 models per rank. In 6th, that meant they gained a rank bonus. When they switched it from 4 models/rank in 6th to 5 models/rank in 7th, that meant, by RAW, beastmen no longer formed units that generated a rank bonus. And Games Workshop held it up and didn't FAQ it (to fix it), even though everyone believed RAI they should form ranks. That was the purpose and intent of the rule and it was still ruled that they went from skirmishers that formed ranked units to... idiots. It was yet another rule that made them the crapiest army around.
Anyways, my point is that GW will sometimes apply RAW to bypass RAI. Sometimes not. Sometimes it will make absolutely no sense and go against how many people feel it should be played, but they'll still do it. Keep in mind, that either the Coach will be nerfed, or it will gain a sizeable boost in effectiveness this edition.
Don't try to mix common sense and RAW with warhammer; that can only lead to madness.
But yes, I DO believe there's a valid 'loop hole'. Let me be clear I don't play like this, and don't think it should be played like this, but I am a huge proponent of RAW. With RAI, each person may interpret the rules a little differently, and that can cause issues.